Fired? Speak no evil.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/03/opinion/fired-speak-no-evil.html?_r=0#!

Extremely interesting and worthy of the maximum diffusion.

My opinion on that. I've always tried in my job to separate personal aspects and job aspects. This allows (should allow) me to analyze in a cooler and better way what's happening in my environment, if my company's behavior is consistant, with me, or my group, but also in general. What are strenght points and weakness points of my company, etc. Of course, mi deepest wish is that this "cool" attitude goes beyond the job contract. This means two things. If someone is fired, it's not correct to scream or yell for "unfair behavior" etc..., but, on the other side, the experience done is done, and if someone wants to share it and analyze, as cool as possible, pros and cons of the company, he must be free of doing it. Clause No. 12  is simply absurd.

I've always identified freedom and responsibility. Not in the sense that they are linked, or tightly linked, but in the sense that they are the same thing. When you are in the position of acting, you're free to act, and this means that you're responsible (=able to respond) of your action. Firing someone, but giving an escape clause like that means: "I want to be free, but I don't want to be bothered by anybody with questions on my actions".

That is not my policy. That is not correct.